How does peer review improve writing quality?

Peer review enhances writing quality primarily by providing constructive feedback and introducing new perspectives. When writers share their work with peers, they receive insights from fresh eyes that may identify unclear arguments, gaps in logic, or areas where further elaboration is needed. This feedback can help the writer see their work from different angles, which is invaluable for improving clarity, coherence, and overall effectiveness.

Additionally, constructive feedback is typically aimed at helping the writer grow and refine their skills rather than simply pointing out flaws. This encourages revision and rethinking, ultimately leading to a more polished and impactful final piece. The variety of perspectives contributes to a more robust and comprehensive approach to writing, aligning it with the expectations and interests of a broader audience.

The other options do not accurately capture the essence of how peer review works. While alternative opinions can be involved, the process is structured, guiding the writer toward improvement rather than just presenting random critiques. Moreover, peer review does not solely rely on expert editors; it includes input from various peers, which fosters a collaborative learning environment. Finally, it complements rather than eliminates the need for self-assessment, as writers still engage in self-evaluation alongside the feedback from peers.